“ The funny thing was, when I removed them, I started to row better, then when before I purchased them.”
I always felt they were a great training tool.
Geezus, let it go man!!!! Let it GO!!!!!!!
Moderator: lt.wolf
-
- Old timer
- Posts: 3670
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:07 am
- Location: right on your bow ball and walking
Re: Geezus, let it go man!!!! Let it GO!!!!!!!
No, the very fact that you used the terms shapes, sizes, and diameters separately from the term interface means that changes in those aspects are not intrinsic changes to the water/oar surface interface. Randall Foil installation results in a change to the blade shape, which is allowable. Definitely not the same.
World Rowing may end up allow it (I don't think they should, inasmuch as they shouldn't allow sharkskin riblet tape on hulls, which is also accessible to all and exclusive to none). But it won't be because the committee can't tell the difference between the water/oar surface interface and a blade's shape/size or shaft diameter. You might as well put riblet tape on your oar shafts, which -- has World Rowing ruled on that?
Re: Geezus, let it go man!!!! Let it GO!!!!!!!
They already allowed turbulator tape on shafts.
https://wingsandwheels.com/turbulator-dimple-tape.html
GBR, NED and others used it in mid-2010s. No proof it does anything beyond testing bias, and so cheap it doesn't rise to any level of concern.
It's over. It's been over for a decade. Let it go.
https://wingsandwheels.com/turbulator-dimple-tape.html
GBR, NED and others used it in mid-2010s. No proof it does anything beyond testing bias, and so cheap it doesn't rise to any level of concern.
It's over. It's been over for a decade. Let it go.
Re: Geezus, let it go man!!!! Let it GO!!!!!!!
The only interface FISA are interested in is between water and hull. That's where the vast majority of drag occurs. Drag from oars, etc, is too small for them to worry about.
Re: Geezus, let it go man!!!! Let it GO!!!!!!!
So, Ian says in his video that we'd rather want a drop shaped oar shaft, then we'd not need the stickers.
Then we should look at Dreher's solution:
https://www.durhamboat.com/oars/scullin ... al-sculls/
(aerodynamic)
By coincidence, I picked up a set of Dreher Aerodynamic sculls after my club's squad decided they are too hard to row with. It is certainly "feelable" that in a head wind the feathered oar has less resistance than traditional round shafts. But indeed they are harder to row with, but I persisted using them and now feel as comfortable as with any other oar. In fact now that I know what to expect, they are my clear favourite. Took a year or so.
Then we should look at Dreher's solution:
https://www.durhamboat.com/oars/scullin ... al-sculls/
(aerodynamic)
By coincidence, I picked up a set of Dreher Aerodynamic sculls after my club's squad decided they are too hard to row with. It is certainly "feelable" that in a head wind the feathered oar has less resistance than traditional round shafts. But indeed they are harder to row with, but I persisted using them and now feel as comfortable as with any other oar. In fact now that I know what to expect, they are my clear favourite. Took a year or so.
Re: Geezus, let it go man!!!! Let it GO!!!!!!!
Why is he putting them on the trailing side of the shaft? I thought that the normal place for the trip strips was on the leading half of the oar to induce turbulent flow and delay separation.