https://www.skysports.com/olympics/news ... o-olympics
Decided by the athletes themselves
Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
-
- Old timer
- Posts: 6860
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 9:02 am
- Location: London
Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
The older I get, the better I was
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
Decided by some athletes who responded to a poll.
There are more than 11,000 athletes in the games.
How did the poll break along national lines? Were the answers made public to the NOCs?
There are more than 11,000 athletes in the games.
How did the poll break along national lines? Were the answers made public to the NOCs?
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
The full published results (rather than a news article about them) have much more data broken down per country, per question, etc.
Considering pollsters try to predict elections with a smaller sample size of a much larger population, the 3,500 size seems appropriate.
The breakdown of countries with the highest % of discomfort with athletes "to have an opportunity to demonstrate or to express their individual views on political issues and other topics" feels in line with the world - China & Russia lead the way.
The survey report from Publicis Sport & Entertainment
https://www.olympic.org/athlete365/app/ ... on-PSE.pdf
The full IOC AC Athlete Expression report
https://www.olympic.org/athlete365/app/ ... 4.2021.pdf
Considering pollsters try to predict elections with a smaller sample size of a much larger population, the 3,500 size seems appropriate.
The breakdown of countries with the highest % of discomfort with athletes "to have an opportunity to demonstrate or to express their individual views on political issues and other topics" feels in line with the world - China & Russia lead the way.
The survey report from Publicis Sport & Entertainment
https://www.olympic.org/athlete365/app/ ... on-PSE.pdf
The full IOC AC Athlete Expression report
https://www.olympic.org/athlete365/app/ ... 4.2021.pdf
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56858863
The problem is that sport and politics often cross.
When does a uniform become a statement?
I think sport should be sport and there is joy & greatness in that.
But the bureaucracy backing the athletes can sow very bad things.
I don't have a stance on the protests, but i am tired of hearing "shut up & play" - that is how exceedingly bad things are allowed to go on for generations of athletes (US Gymnastics, for example)
The problem is that sport and politics often cross.
When does a uniform become a statement?
I think sport should be sport and there is joy & greatness in that.
But the bureaucracy backing the athletes can sow very bad things.
I don't have a stance on the protests, but i am tired of hearing "shut up & play" - that is how exceedingly bad things are allowed to go on for generations of athletes (US Gymnastics, for example)
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:56 am
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
These are great points. "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”sandor wrote:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56858863
The problem is that sport and politics often cross.
When does a uniform become a statement?
I think sport should be sport and there is joy & greatness in that.
But the bureaucracy backing the athletes can sow very bad things.
I don't have a stance on the protests, but i am tired of hearing "shut up & play" - that is how exceedingly bad things are allowed to go on for generations of athletes (US Gymnastics, for example)
Also, is it REALLY a "political" statement to OPPOSE travelling to, competing in, and thereby passively supporting a government that is presently and actively committing a genocide of a religious/ethnic minority citizenry?
I would argue that going and competing in China's national capital in 2022 *IS* a political statement. A political statement that says: getting to compete in a sport of my choosing is MUCH more important than the millions of victims of an active genocide.
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
Yeah but McDavid, McKinnon, Crosby etc !?! I mean is it really millions or just hundreds of thousands?Big Koala VI wrote:These are great points. "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”sandor wrote:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56858863
The problem is that sport and politics often cross.
When does a uniform become a statement?
I think sport should be sport and there is joy & greatness in that.
But the bureaucracy backing the athletes can sow very bad things.
I don't have a stance on the protests, but i am tired of hearing "shut up & play" - that is how exceedingly bad things are allowed to go on for generations of athletes (US Gymnastics, for example)
Also, is it REALLY a "political" statement to OPPOSE travelling to, competing in, and thereby passively supporting a government that is presently and actively committing a genocide of a religious/ethnic minority citizenry?
I would argue that going and competing in China's national capital in 2022 *IS* a political statement. A political statement that says: getting to compete in a sport of my choosing is MUCH more important than the millions of victims of an active genocide.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 121
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 11:56 am
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
(Because it's only over text, I can't tell the tone of this that well :/ but I shall assume that it was made in good faith!)loblaw wrote:Yeah but McDavid, McKinnon, Crosby etc !?! I mean is it really millions or just hundreds of thousands?
There are officially 12.8 Million Uyghurs in China. And if one uses a liberal definition of 'genocide', then I would say that a person is a victim of genocide if they are displaced, re-located, and/or re-educated within a broader genocide.
No doubt that that lineup would be fun to watch [skates and puck go brrrrr], but it doesn't *have* to be in a certain location.
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
Yes, have no doubt it's a tragedy on massive scale. They really missed the boat with Almaty, 2022.Big Koala VI wrote:(Because it's only over text, I can't tell the tone of this that well :/ but I shall assume that it was made in good faith!)loblaw wrote:Yeah but McDavid, McKinnon, Crosby etc !?! I mean is it really millions or just hundreds of thousands?
There are officially 12.8 Million Uyghurs in China. And if one uses a liberal definition of 'genocide', then I would say that a person is a victim of genocide if they are displaced, re-located, and/or re-educated within a broader genocide.
No doubt that that lineup would be fun to watch [skates and puck go brrrrr], but it doesn't *have* to be in a certain location.
-
- JV
- Posts: 88
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 10:33 pm
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
I see both Manchester City and Chelsea players as well as all officials took a knee prior to kick off at the recent Champions League Final in Porto. Respect!
- Attachments
-
- 60b2986a85f5407fb93c5c75.jpg (127.75 KiB) Viewed 856 times
Re: Taking the knee banned at Tokyo Olympics
English soccer has had a high-profile anti-racism campaign going all season. Everyone takes the knee, it lasts about 10 seconds, the crowds applaud it, and then the game starts. It doesn't interrupt anything but it keeps the campaign in the spotlight, as intended. The right way to do it IMHO.oneofthorsboys wrote:I see both Manchester City and Chelsea players as well as all officials took a knee prior to kick off at the recent Champions League Final in Porto. Respect!