lt.wolf wrote:Excuse me, sorry to interrupt
Does anyone have the link to the racing? Thank you
Thank you and like I said let’s get back to racing.
lt.wolf wrote:Excuse me, sorry to interrupt
Does anyone have the link to the racing? Thank you
Are the rosters really cut from an official paperwork filing, is that just dressing for the game kind of language?Slim wrote:Biggest challenge for women's rowing is the size of the championship - it's the only sport where half the roster is cut right before the championship.
Right. Grow the sport as long as it is Division 1.fullmetal wrote:Day 1:
D1 AM: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4216 (9AM ET)
D1 PM: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4217 (4:10PM ET)
D2 AM: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4218 (11:20 ET)
D2 PM: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4219 (5:20PM ET)
D3 AM: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4220 (8:10AM ET)
D3 PM: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4221 (3:45PM ET)
Day 2:
D1: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4222 (8:10AM ET)
D2: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4223 (11AM ET)
D3: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4224 (10:30AM ET)
Day 3:
D1: https://www.ncaa.com/event/4225 (8:10AM ET)
Post of the year. Slim cut through the bullish!t like few have.Slim wrote:In case anyone was wondering, middle aged men are the experts on what does and doesn't inspire High School girls.
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=91695 ... ef=sharing
They’re done, not cut. What other sport has only half the roster travel and compete at their national championship?rowing wrote:Are the rosters really cut from an official paperwork filing, is that just dressing for the game kind of language?Slim wrote:Biggest challenge for women's rowing is the size of the championship - it's the only sport where half the roster is cut right before the championship.
The biggest of all the NCAA sports doesn't even dress all of their scholarship athletes for every game, let alone the national championship. 85 Scholarships. 105 Roster cap. I am seeing reports of both 105 and 125 so I assume it is in season vs. off season? The SEC only allows 60 to dress for conference games. Big 10 70. The NCAA 82. Still less than all scholarship athletes, and depending on conference/time on the calendar it is half the roster.Slim wrote:They’re done, not cut. What other sport has only half the roster travel and compete at their national championship?rowing wrote:Are the rosters really cut from an official paperwork filing, is that just dressing for the game kind of language?Slim wrote:Biggest challenge for women's rowing is the size of the championship - it's the only sport where half the roster is cut right before the championship.
Carrying 50 athletes and racing 23 leaves a lot of potentially disgruntled kids on shore after your conference championship. No other equivalency sport has a championship roster essentially the same size as the # of full rides - most sit right around 50%. Applying that to rowing and you’d have a championship with 40-46 athletes.
I don’t disagree but on the flip side, the Ivies are showing a bit of a resurgence, good for them, so could just be more crowded.Mango wrote:What the hell happened to the ACC over the years?
It feels like the conference championships were always a blast because there was a lot of depth in B-Final NCAA schools competing. Clemson has been circling the drain for some time. ND got last. Louisville looked promising for a minute a few years ago and have now disappeared. Syracuse is the best of the rest, but two seconds behind a UVA crew that got last in their heat.
I am happy to see parity in the sport, I think it is good. But it is wild that an entire conference has just sort of fallen so far.
Duke and others lay it all out during the season, just to get to NCAA's. When they get there, they may be toast. Others (Stanford, Texas, etc.) are certain they will make it and are developing speed all spring long. One good program that stayed home had a compromised athlete in their stern 3 each of their last two races: a personal tragedy one race and severe illness the next. They may have been fast enough to deserve a bid, but lackluster performances doomed them. Had that happened to Duke, they may have stayed home. If you're a bubble crew, you need to build a resume.gamestop wrote:I don’t disagree but on the flip side, the Ivies are showing a bit of a resurgence, good for them, so could just be more crowded.Mango wrote:What the hell happened to the ACC over the years?
It feels like the conference championships were always a blast because there was a lot of depth in B-Final NCAA schools competing. Clemson has been circling the drain for some time. ND got last. Louisville looked promising for a minute a few years ago and have now disappeared. Syracuse is the best of the rest, but two seconds behind a UVA crew that got last in their heat.
I am happy to see parity in the sport, I think it is good. But it is wild that an entire conference has just sort of fallen so far.
I am surprised to see Duke and Cuse taking a step back (if they are indeed, I’m not sure, just feels like they were climbing the last few years).
Mango wrote:for 90% of the school year it is a really inclusive sport. Close to the entire roster is racing at every race all season long.
Virginia and SMU both squeak in there while Upenn and Mich win the reps. Looked like OSU and Rutgers respectively gave them hell so don't think anyone was not giving full gas.fullmetal wrote: 1V rep 1: Oregon St. and Penn are seeded to advance ahead of Virginia, which would have been unthinkable a few years ago, but here we are. The Cavs have their chance this afternoon.
1V rep 2: Michigan and SMU are seeded to advance. Syracuse and Rutgers will try to challenge. I might actually pick SMU to upset Michigan in the reps if SMU gives it full gas (SMU was only 0.088 sec behind Ohio State at the Longhorn Invite).
While Title IX isn't going anywhere, NCAA is barely holding on to what could be called governance for football in power 5 conferences, so the football balance thing could look very different in not too distant future.rowing wrote: Then the money thing ruins it all. If the football balance thing ever goes away----big trouble.
Outstanding point.JD wrote: Duke and others lay it all out during the season, just to get to NCAA's. When they get there, they may be toast. Others (Stanford, Texas, etc.) are certain they will make it and are developing speed all spring long. One good program that stayed home had a compromised athlete in their stern 3 each of their last two races: a personal tragedy one race and severe illness the next. They may have been fast enough to deserve a bid, but lackluster performances doomed them. Had that happened to Duke, they may have stayed home. If you're a bubble crew, you need to build a resume.