Most Improved for 2024
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Make the final at ACCs and you’ll get a bid.
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Going to be interesting if some of these mid tier programs (Clemson type is what I'm thinking of) are going to look at lot worse with all the additions. "5th in the ACC" sounds decent. Now that's more like 8th/9th. Gotta think that adds some more heat (relatively)
-
- Old timer
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 12:51 am
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Anyone have athletes taking a LOA to make a boat in Paris?
Re: Most Improved for 2024
My guess is Stanford, Texas, Yale, Ohio State have people taking the year off. Could be wrong and there are probably more.socalstroke wrote: ↑Fri Sep 08, 2023 8:18 pm Anyone have athletes taking a LOA to make a boat in Paris?
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Perhaps I should have had Clemson on this list. Not bad this weekend.
Re: Most Improved for 2024
I'd give that honor to Wisco before Clemson.
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Wisco also looks improved.
Tulsa not looking good.
Tulsa not looking good.
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Tennessee rowing sweeps Minnesota in Kim Cupini’s first regatta as head coach
https://www.utdailybeacon.com/sports/ro ... 6c635.html
https://www.utdailybeacon.com/sports/ro ... 6c635.html
-
- Pre-Elite
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:24 pm
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Times a bit too quick this early in.rowingusa wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 10:22 pm Tennessee rowing sweeps Minnesota in Kim Cupini’s first regatta as head coach
https://www.utdailybeacon.com/sports/ro ... 6c635.html
Hard to believe the current was nil with a 5mph cross head.
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Wisco looked technically better and generally fitter than I’ve seen them but they didn’t exhibit as much speed as one might expect after a very mild winter.fullmetal wrote: ↑Sat Mar 30, 2024 10:31 pmWisco looked technically better than I’ve seen them but they didn’t exhibit as much speed as one might expect after a very mild winter.
I didn't get the impression that Wisco did all that well at the Cardinal Invite a couple weekends ago...was that impression wrong?
Perhaps this is a harbinger of better things to come.
Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by fighting back - Piet Hein
Re: Most Improved for 2024
Watch out for BU
I'm unsure if we should give Tennessee credit simply for transferring the squad from SMU. If Tennessee makes significant improvements from where SMU was, then I'd consider them worthy of recognition.
I'm unsure if we should give Tennessee credit simply for transferring the squad from SMU. If Tennessee makes significant improvements from where SMU was, then I'd consider them worthy of recognition.
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: United States
Re: Most Improved for 2024
I think this is a reasonable and objective take. However, all the world is a stage.
The constant theme in a lot of press and podcasts out there is that “everything is great and everyone gets along”. I can get behind the promotion of getting your team to function as a team and the messaging that goes along with that. But for an outside observer, being constantly told by someone else that they are in love with a spouse or parter and have no problems, without being prompted, does make you wonder.
Also, it was quite stunning to see rowing news report on UT as if they had been hired as a pr firm. Most confusing was the author essentially making up an entirely new set of criticisms that no one else was making. Then the author attributed ostensibly made up motives as the reasons for these non-existent criticisms. This is how it read to me: “If you are reading this article and think anything different than what the author is stating here, you are anti-female student athlete, are jealous, and/or need to go to therapy”. In fact, the widely discussed criticism was squarely directed at the head coach and their transition. No female athletes were referenced in criticisms, specifically or generically nor were their decisions to transfer. It was also notable that zero women who stayed at Smu were included in the story, neither was there any disclaimer about those athletes declining interviews. There was no value of that article to the readership or rowing community at large. It was a “sit down and shut up” lecture. The only thing missing was the author writing it in all caps.
All this to say, I’m not really sure an objective take really ever breaks through anymore. Especially in rowing. Which is too bad. We might see a shade more accountability.
Last edited by SQUAREdown on Sun Mar 31, 2024 10:46 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Step Up
-
- Old timer
- Posts: 3689
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:07 am
- Location: right on your bow ball and walking
Re: Most Improved for 2024
I take it the RN piece lauded the transfer portal as an empowering right of women rowers to take their skills elsewhere? I mean, there are many people who don't like the effect the portal has had on men's sports either.